Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Well if it was not sending in a kill, then there's really no way to tell why.
|
Not definitely, but some scenarios are more likely than others.
Oh, and I forgot about
Lommy up there - it looks a bit worse for her, too.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
-Snifflin’ Mac Sparrow ~ Cooper
He is hibernating under Rudolph (to paraphrase Eönwë) and that's somthing I don't like. I keep thinking "oh Mac, nice, ok" when I see his posts and I don't like that at all. I have the feeling that he's innocent but I also have the feeling I'm mistaken here. Will watch him closely from now on. (I wonder if this all is due to him being more quiet than normal maybe...?)
|
That is not vague
at all...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
we should look at those who have been away
|
Those, too, yes.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Besides, it can also be misleading.
|
I don't expect in the least that we could catch all mutineers this way, of course not. But I find the scenario where all mutineers are active and involved and they
still missed the kill unlikely (though not impossible).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Ever heard of a bluffing hunter?
|
Duh. But, if I'm a wolf and the claimed hunter states he is going to pick me then I'm a lot more cautious about killing him than in the case that he states he thinks I'm not suspicious.
Lommy, why are you
so defensive about this thing?
You are right, though, that it borders a bit on the "meta" level. I do not advocate lynching someone only because he's more quiet or has been away, just saying we should have an extra eye on them. We are sorely lacking knowledge, so every little valid assumption is helpful.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
I wouldn't have passed up a night kill.
|
Says he who missed yesterday's deadline because he fell asleep.
