Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shasta
Greenie (where is she anyway?)
|
She's at her mom's summer cabin and has very bad access to the net - and probably doesn't care too much any more.
But talking of which... unless we have
Greenie's spy-reveal contested we just need to stick with
Nerwen being not a mutineer. But I'd bet she could be a co-conspie... (well, it seems I'd bet that for everyone of you...
)
Even if you call me a co-conspie, I think I need to say this: if there is a real spy still alive somewhere with even one living innocent's name, you should really consider coming forwards. We can't trust
Nerwen for ever if
Greenie was an impostor and soon even one known innocent might make the difference (in case we were going to lynch her/him). But your call to be sure.
The sad possibility is that
Greenie was a co-conspie and got it right naming a mutineer-
Nerwen as the innocent (a blind shot but amazingly well made!) and the real spy has been killed or lynched without us knownig anything. Although I think that ghosted seer would have said a word or two about the matter already, so I'm somewhat confident that is not the case.
Also
Gwath is not a mutineer as he was so heavily suspected by
Rikae - the proven hunter - and the mutineers wouldn't have tried to get her killed during the Night just because of that.
Also I strongly suspect thet one of the pair
Lommy -
Mac is a mutineer but which one? I'm leaning towards
Mac at this point but can't really be too sure.
Lommy could fool us.
I suspect
Mith a lot right now. A lot. Like I did in the beginning.
Izzy's and
Nerwen's turn-arounds might even speak good for them; afraid of losing the ranger they turned on their heels and retracted. I mean, if they (either of them) were mutineers with
Mac why should they have voted for him in the first place - and so early as they had an opportunity to come back later in the Day? Hard to say...
Shasta's vote for
Lommy directly after
Mac's "revealment" is also understandable.
But with all the three I must say there is something that bothers me. It looks like they hadn't read the discussion and how things evolved... or then they used that possible interpretation as something to hide their more uglier motives?
I mean
Mac's "revelation" was just downright horrible. When he made it he was having 5 votes with only
Gwath having one vote besides him (and clearly
Gwath is a no lynch candidate right here). So a last desperate option that did pay off to the amazement of
Mac himself even? And as I said already yesterDay, he managed not to point the most obvious reason why people should not lynch him as a ranger which any ranger would have voiced in that situation...
But I do have problems with
Lommy as well... It was just a bit too neat she would only now "reveal" she was the "true ranger". A bit too convenient a timing! Although there is this from yesterDay eg. long before
Lommy "revealed":
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
If he's the ranger then it's my mistake and you are all welcome to neg-rep me. But after the discussion after his reveal it should be obvious to others than me too that he's not.
|
Which does look like something the real ranger might write...