Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Actually, Noggins started the "will the real Seer please step forward" meme yesterDay. I didn't much like that then, and I don't like Eönwë's carrying it on toDay– looks a bit like, "Pssst! Cobbler! Here's how you can help out!"
|
I see what you are thinking but that's not the case. I think if anyone comes forwards toDay as "the real seer", we'll have a bunch of tough questions to her/him before even considering of believing her/him.
Staying silent for this long in this kind of situation would be just irresponsible behaviour - even if s/he had only a little information. But as
Nerwen said, she should have knowledge on
Nerwen at least and I can't see why s/he wouldn't have enlightened us about that already.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mith
Don't' trust Nogrod.. remember Rikae chose him and he suspected me with no evidence presented.
|
Do you really think no innocent ever suspects another innocent? That innocents, especially gifteds have it right everytime? Like those hunters who kill the seers in revenge during the Night when they are killed... (some of you probably remember that one?)
And to add: if you suspect me for not giving evidence to suspect you, then did you present evidence for actually voting me
Mith? And what kind of evidence could one produce in this game in the first place with no knowledge about anything?
It was a gut feeling arising from the way you played and how you were more than happy to jump on me in the very beginning "with no reasons whatsoever" (sic) - but it has now been proved wrong. Were there not so many competing claims for cobblery already I'd say you
Mith were one of them cobblers but maybe not... or whatever.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Hmmn. I wasn't all that keen on Gwath's talk of lynching ghosts yesterDay.
|
Neither was I. And I think that's one of the reasons
Gwath almost always gets lynched pretty early in the games. He throws in things like that and looks so suspicious people lynch him just to be sure. But I still think that
Rikae's strong suspicions against him and the mutineer's decision to attack
Rikae the confessed hunter would have been a bit too risky move from the mutineers if
Gwath was one of them.
Alongside with
Nerwen's possible (probable?) innocence that's the only other "fact" we can even imagine to stick with in the situation we are. (Fex. I wouldn't bet too highly on either
Lommmy or
Mac being the innocent one - it could really go either way).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
The worse news is that if there's two wolves and a cobbler, they can win toDay whatever we do.
|
Looking at the brighter side of it, the co-conspie still doesn't actually know anything and therefore can vote in a wrong way from her/his perspective. And there is a chance we have alredy lynched (or the mutineers have killed) both the conspies already...
We just don't know.