|
Gah, I thought I could get away with little participation today, but now Lommy is using the fact that many people foolishly believe her ranger-claim to make big outrageous cases.
Please, people, when reading that, always keep in mind that,
1) You don't know what her role is.
2) Her analysis depends entirely on Sally and me being mutineer role. The latter is wrong, though inanely consistent for her, the former is a fallacy, since Sally could just as well be a conspirator (think about it just once: the fact that she admitted to being evil makes conspiration infinitely more likely than mutiny).
I think a similar analysis of Lommy is due, if only for some balance.
|