Quote:
Originally Posted by Macalaure
This comment doesn't make me less suspicious at all. If my point was not just good, but really good, then why the "on the other hand"? Doesn't fit together. Also, why comment on my comment on lists in general, and not on my comment about her list in particular?
I don't like the Sally-waggon one bit more than the Nerwen-waggon, therefore, even though I intended to wait with the vote:
++Nienna
|
Now... I've sat out a lot of these games since I was a carefree pre-university student, and I've not read most of the ones I've missed, so there's a lot of WW-culture current that I'm not up with--but one thing I
have picked up on is that
Nienna has something of an unreasonable penchant for being unreasonably lynched on Days 1. Which means that, coupled with
Mac's almost immediate reply to
Nienna's post--a Day-ending post, suggesting she won't be back before the end of the Day to defend herself--I am really not liking
Mac's quoted post. It's a little too easy. He sees a couple bandwaggons, says he doesn't like them, and then expresses this by starting--potentially--one of the easiest Day 1 bandwaggons there is?
I'd rather vote for a
Sally-- or
Nerwen--waggon at this point, than jump on that.