[wilwarin538]

So I looked over the posts that Stally and Nienna did about McCaber and took just afew of the quotes and added some of my own comments.

Originally Posted by McCaber

Well so far I don't have any more brilliant insights. Although for what it's worth I think we have time for a Legate lynch toDay, and be ready to sort things out later.

But much of my thought process is pending on what happens toDay yet.

Kinda like "I'm not posting til you all do", way to leave us all the work. What he says in the bolded part really goes against what he says here later in the Day:

Originally Posted by McCaber

I cannot in good conscience vote Legate after I made a point yesterDay on what to do in this exact circumstance

In that same post he votes for Inzil, a known wolf, when there is no chance of him getting lynched, which really helps out what he says here on Day 3:

Originally Posted by McCaber

Well, all that I can say is that I was right. The guarding was an extremely easy tactic for the wolves to manipulate. In fact, I would not be surprised if the Legate lynch was largely driven by the wolves to see how much they could get away with.

Considering how wide the margin was in favor of Legate, I can even see all four wolves voting him. I mean, Nilp and I were the only ones who didn't, and I'm having a hard time seeing a wolf in him.

Seems to really be trying to make himself look good. And the part about him and Nilp seems weird, if he's guilty I doubt Nilp is.

Then later on he quite randomly says this:

Originally Posted by McCaber

And I will say that I still think The Plan was a bad idea. A revealed Seer is vulnerable, and we would have no real way of testing the veracity of such a claim.

Hmm, too bad that since our Ranger is still alive our Seer probably would have been too right now, which could have potentially given us five of her dreams. Not even just that though (since that's just my personal oppinion), but like why is he bringing this up 2 days later when it has absolutely no significance to anything?? Especially when practically everyone thought it was a bad idea and that seemed to have already been established. Considering how little he contributed this just was really unneeded.

Originally Posted by McCaber

About the one kill: our mod said yesterDay that the wolves would only get one night kill on top of alona. Since we lynched Inzil, presumably that means that the wolves only got one kill total, which they then used on alona instead of who they really wanted.

This just doesn't make sense to me, I mean I suppose he could have just misunderstood the rules, like I did, but it was such a small contribution and then nothing from him for a while until this:

Originally Posted by McCaber

Hakon is doing his level best to appear suspicious, while Pitchwife is doing the exact opposite. He's taking actions which look suspicious, but he explains himself well and seems genuine. I know, a rather simple analysis, but it works for me.

I am wary of joining the Hakon wagon, just because his actions scream "cobbler" or "confused" much more than wolf. Although, a wolf hiding in plain sight like that is possible, it's just not the read I'm getting.

Rather simple indeed, and I don't completely understand where he stands regarding Pitch, does he find him suspicious or no??

So I am still very wary of McCaber, and I can see myself voting for him once again.