Thanks for making that post,
Nienna. It made me feel better about you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
Lommy I am truly sorry if you are at all offended. Even if you are a wolf I don't want anyone to be offended. It is not fun.
|
Nah, never mind, I'm just old and grumpy, not offended.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
I obviously was very wrong. I am not infallible but I do put my trust into Sally and Lottie. If you are an innocent I beg you to do the same. To me it is clear that there are three wolves in a list of four people.
|
I can see you trust them, but I can see nothing but very vague reasons for that, which kind of alarms me. And
I cannot trust them merely because you ask me to (especially as I'm far from sure of your innocence).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
1. You tried to keep yourself as captain. You said yesterday that you did not want anyone to have that much power but as soon as it was an option for yourself you wanted to keep it. Today is the one day where it can be fatal to have one person be able to make that decision. You even said yourself that you aren't sure if you could make the correct decision while being captain.
|
I know. Power corrupts.
No, but seriously, toDay is also the one Day when it's fatal to have a wolf in the post. That's why I would prefer being the Captain (but let's not argue about that as I seem to be the only one who wants that, understandably). But - do you think that as a wolf I would've dared to eat my word and abandon the ideals I had been promoting all game especially as there was whatsoever no support for my continued captaincy in sight?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
I'm sorry if it feels arrogant or if it makes people feel left out but it is what we need to do to survive. If we were wolves we would not openly all band together like this as it would make people who know they are innocent know that we are all wolves.
|
It would only be easier for the remaining innocent(s) if you bothered to tell why you trust each other. And I think it would be sort of ingenious of wolves to band together like that precisely because no one would think they'd be so obvious.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
3. You've completely ignored Sally's Parody
|
And she ignored the rules because she wrote it as if there was only one ranger.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
If Sally, Lottie, and I were all wolves I would not have had to tell Sally anything.
|
A fair point. But you could still be doing it for a show.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
Not cool. We've discussed suspicion based on Meta-game before and it really should be used cautiously.
|
I don't think that's meta-game, but if you think so, we can leave it to that.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
If I was a wolf I probably would have left Fea alive because she was clearly (in my mind at least) the top lynch suspect for toDay. It would have been an easy wolf win.
|
And so would probably every sensible person, or at least they can claim so easily. The question is why this happened after all.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
I'm not sure why you are stopping at 15 mins before DL...
|
If you mean why did I pick that number it's because I did that then yesterDay because I needed to know.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nienna
The pack would be smart to not make themselves obvious by all voting for an innocent. If 3 innocents voted one person and 3 wolves voted another then the innocent who is left would have to choose and if they choose with the innocents then all the wolves are known and it is just a matter of time before the village wins. If the wolves all vote for a packmate then the next Day the village is still confused.
|
It may be obvious to vote the same innocent, but not "an innocent" in general. If they're voting their mates, it is a huge risk.
Off to finish my analysis...