Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitchwife
1. We don't know what spells old Telchar wrought into the blade, and the elven-smiths of Rivendell may have added some of their own. So it's entirely possible that there was some magic in the sword that would kill anybody trying to draw it except for its legitimate owner (or those authorized by him, taking into account the exceptions that Inzil points out).
|
Now that brings thoughts of Túrin's
Gurthang (formerly known as Anglachel). Thingol gave that sword to Beleg first, and Melian was moved to say this when she looked upon it:
Quote:
|
'There is malice in this sword. The dark heart of the smith still dwells in it.'
|
Túrin later took it from the body of Beleg, and when Túrin sought to use it to kill himself with it, he heard a voice he perceived to come from the sword itself.
Quote:
|
Yea, I will drink thy blood gladly, that so I may forget the blood of Beleg my master....
|
Silm Of Túrin Turambar (both)
There was a sword which apparently held some faith for its master's hand, at least, though it's conjecture whether that was the case with Andúril.
All this actually leads into something I've long wondered about
: why did Aragorn feel the need to carry Narsil with him? The work of protecting the Shire and the North had to have involved fighting from time to time. Wouldn't a usable sword have been more of an asset in those circumstances than an heirloom of such historical significance?