Now up and continuing...
Shasta
Day 1-
#171 doesn't see anything on
Mnemo and
Mac, votes
Inzil.
Day 2-
#220 defends Day 1 vote saying he wasn't "sure" about
Mac and
Mnemo's innocence, but Inzil looked the least innocent of the three.
#234 doesn't trust
Nerwen, her vote could have been to kill
Mac, or to save Inzil or possibly
Mnemo.
#354 votes
Nerwen (1/1), confirms what Nienna said about his Day 1 vote.
Quote:
|
I believe he was voting to save Mac and Mnemo not necessarily to kill Zil... does that make sense? ...and Shasta feel free to correct me as I'm speaking about something that might be untrue.
|
I don't think his Day 1 vote looks bad. In principle it's not bad to cast a vote to save someone you think is more innocent. I don't think the most suspicious part is his defense of voting for
Inzil, but the fact that he doesn't trust
Nerwen's Day 1 vote, because her vote could have been to save
Inzil or
Mnemo (or kill
Mac). Now,
Shasta said he was voting not to kill
Inzil because he really thought he was a wolf, but to save
Mac and
Mnemo who he thought looked more innocent. If you weren't all that suspicious of
Inzil in the first place, then why jump on
Nerwen's vote?
Then his Day 2 vote is suspicious, not in
wilwa's way, but by adding in another name to the pot a
Shasta-wolf could have been hoping
Mnemo would have gotten lost in the mix of names.
Shasta looks highly suspicious, but I'm not willing to rule out being a misled innocent just yet.
Bes
Day 1- #42 notes
Roa and
Mnemo's point about lynching people on Day 1.
And that was the only time I noticed Bes say something to
Mnemo. Possibly a wolf trying to keep at a distance, but that's weak paranoid speculation on my part. Based on interaction with
Mnemo, he looks ok.
Nerwen
Day 1- Nada, intended to vote
Mac.
Day 2-
#268
Mnemo suddenly looks sinister (I believe referring to #263)
#277 still not liking
Mnemo
#293 thinks
sally hacked into
Mnemo's account
#293 debates
Mnemo or
Lottie
#301 votes
Mnemo (1/7) but expresses uncertainty about it.
First to vote for
Mnemo, which could be a wolf-on-wolf spot, but like
Greenie everything matches up with
Nerwen. She was the first to notice
Mnemo was very different than from Day 1. It appeared to take
Nerwen (and several others) by surprise. Even though everyone could see it (shouldn't say everyone, because I chose to ignore it completely), why would another wolf draw attention to it? I have no reservations about assuming
Nerwen innocent.
Lommy
Day 1-
#58 a list and
Mnemo is quite "eye-brow raising"
#95 suspects
Mnemo a bit
#151 could vote for
Nienna or
Mnemo
#157 doesn't want to be the 3rd straight vote for
Mnemo, because that would start a band-wagon and doesn't think
Mnemo deserves it.
#163
Nienna would be a throw away, so
Nog or
Mnemo...
#168 votes
Mnemo (3/3)
Day 2-
#273
Mnemo is odd and leaning towards guilty
#328
Mnemo and
sally both raising eye-brows.
Mnemo slightly more
#350 would be least sorry to lynch
Mnemo
#362 votes
Mnemo (and breaks the massive tie of 1-vote getters)
Voted for
Mnemo twice which makes her look very innocent. Also the placement of her 2-votes don't make sense for being wolf-on-wolf. Unless if for Day 2
Mnemo was planning to go sacrificial, but even then it doesn't make sense considering #328 where
Lommy makes the astute point:
Quote:
|
And Mnemo has got about as many defenders as accusers.
|
This is worthy of more consideration. But first it's time to continue the increasingly lame use of playing with ice puns...
Mnemo was definitely polar-izing!
Ok, back to
Lommy. Anyway,
Lommy makes that point, and if a fellow-wolf notices that
Mnemo has still quite a lot of defenders, why put her in the lead at that point?
One more thing for you
Lommy, don't take offense, it's further attempt to offer help. From Day 1, from #157
Quote:
|
Darn, Eomer's vote for Mnemo makes me hesitant to vote her, because that would turn the Mnemo-votes to a bandwagon and I'm not sure if she deserves that.
|
Now, I've come to expect a certain flippety-floppety from you, but that's just silly. You were going to vote for
Mnemo, but were seriously considering not to because then it would be a bandwagon? Then you wind up casting the 3rd vote anyway (albeit
Bes voted for
Mac inbetween) but how could you rationalize that you still weren't bandwagoning? *sigh of disbelief*
For a normal person, I would be scratching my head at that silly line of reasoning, and seriously consider it for looking wolf-on-wolf. But, you are not normal,
and strangely enough I understand the Finns are much nicer, and more considerate than me. Seriously though, realize you've got skillz at this and don't doubt yourself so much, least of all for something as silly as not wanting to bandwagon.
Edit: crossed with
Mac