The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum - View Single Post

satansaloser2005 · 12-04-2009, 11:37 AM

I'll agree with Pitch. There's no reason the ranger would reveal right now (unless of course they were waggoned on) because there's no false ranger reveal. So there's no reasoning as such behind Lottie revealing in order to catch the ranger. A potential seer, yes, but not the ranger. The question is, is Bes making this argument because he's evil (in which case I think Lottie would be innocent) or because he's just the new kid on the block? I've no idea, but the entire affair smells to me, no matter which party/parties may be evil.

12-04-2009, 11:37 AM	#518
satansaloser2005 The Sweetest Spoiler Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: from beneath you it giggles incessantly Posts: 5,789	I'll agree with Pitch. There's no reason the ranger would reveal right now (unless of course they were waggoned on) because there's no false ranger reveal. So there's no reasoning as such behind Lottie revealing in order to catch the ranger. A potential seer, yes, but not the ranger. The question is, is Bes making this argument because he's evil (in which case I think Lottie would be innocent) or because he's just the new kid on the block? I've no idea, but the entire affair smells to me, no matter which party/parties may be evil. __________________ "My heart always cowers behind the defense of my wit." Friendship is two pals munching on a well-cooked face together. Fenris bookworm.