Boro - flipfloppy in #445, about wolf-on-wolf on
Mnemo. Makes an assumptive generalization in #472 that I'm uncomfortable with. I will also note that though
Boro thinks that a wolvish attempt to fenris one of their own is extremely unlikely (especially regarding
Greenie),
Mac's done it before and won. Suspicious of
Wilwa for "deflecting suspicion" from [b]Mnemo[b] - I don't see it. Also, #482 is putting words in my mouth. I didn't jump on
Nerwen's vote because I thought she was trying to save
Inzil, I jumped on it because it would have killed
Mac and I didn't think "dodgy reasoning" was a good enough reason to warrant that kind of vote. His point #2 in #491 is a load of bull (sorry,
Boro, but it is) - when making a fake role, you (as a baddie) always want to be as "provably specific" as you can, because it's more believable. I have an example if you want one. (I was innocent at the time, but it still makes my point.
) Regarding #501, you should know by now that
Nogrod has a grand old time playing devil's advocate. I actually wasn't suspicious of you until I began this Day 3 analysis, buuuuuut....
Eomer - considers
Mac and
Nogrod potential wolves, implies that
Nerwen,
Lommy,
Greenie, and
Pitch are all innocent. I felt odd about him Day 1, but this seems like a subtle attempt to remove some people from suspicion without actually coming out and saying same. My radar is bleeping, quite loud.
Lostie - #462, "most confident" in
Nienna's innocence. Won't vote her today, though, on account of the reveal. #467 looks like it's in concert with
Nienna to drum up different suspects, which seems off. I'm uncomfortable with her vote for
Bes. I've noticed that it's been put out there that
Lostie might be trying to pull a Ranger-protect in order to give the wolves a free kill - but why would the wolves sacrifice another of their own just to ensure a free kill, when there's an extremely
low chance of a successful protect? If this were later in the game, it might be viable, but not with so many of us left.
Morsul - votes himself. Would a wolf do that? I don't see why they wouldn't. Not a definitive tell either way.
Brinn - a voice of reason in #469. However, there's subtle pushing against a
Nienna lynch, which might tell us a lot. I still think there's some connection with
Nerwen. Regarding #508 - just because you've acted a certain way in the past doesn't mean you can't change the way you act in the present.
Pitch - qualifier in #451. I've noticed he does this a lot, and it grates on me just a little.
Wilwa notes that
Mnemo concentrated on him and even voted him. I pretty much agree with
Wilwa's assessment of him in #497.
Nienna - tried saving
Mnemo two days in a row. Why didn't she vote
Lostie instead of
Lommy, though? Also, tries to make a bit of a mountain out of
Nerwen's use of the word "dodgy". #466 looks like it's in concert with
Lostie to drum up new suspects, which seems off. Makes me snicker wildly in #485.
Nog - #453 says a whole lot about what he thinks, without actually saying anything. Leaves a bad taste. Is silly and contradictory in #489, but it's not a major point. It's more amusing than suspicious.
Mac - is disappointingly aligned with
Boro.
Sally - day 2 vote could have been a try at saving
Mnemo. She also keeps semi-suspecting me for no reason, and I find that odd. Am I being set up for something? Example: #484, #488, and especially #515.
Lommy - I feel good about #483 (even if she does have me in the "probably guilty" category.
).
Nerwen - first vote for
Mnemo. If I'm continuing with my line of suspicion, that's two wolf-on-wolf votes in a row... improbable. I'm starting to have a reversal on what I think of
Nerwen, but it's been more because of
Nienna's words/reactions than anything she herself has done.
Bes - apparently forgets there's a Ranger in this game? Probable newbieness, could have been instructed to play that up by a wolf partner? Vote for
Lostie makes me nervous.
Wilwa - Something I've been meaning to answer for a while -
Mnemo's #222 was a response to a question I asked earlier in the thread, about why it's bad to vote to save someone.
Greenie - Regarding #514: She did! What was I supposed to say? Also, I agree with her comments on
Eomer in #535.
Note - I have only read to #537. I notice it's only about 13 minutes to deadline and I'd like to give people a chance to read the post I've been working on for an hour and a half.
Edit - formatting, and I probably X'ed a couple times.