Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
As far as voting for Inzil, I'm not going to say anything, because there's no way to answer it. You buy it, but still some unexplained thing doesn't sit right? That helps.
|
The reasoning seems sound, but the fact remains, you voted someone of lesser suspicion over someone of greater suspicion. That's what doesn't sit right with me. That help?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
I can. You don't have to believe me, but I can, and I can say it. The burden of proof is on you to prove I'm wrong. If and when you do, I'll be the first to eat a toaster. My methods aren't infallible, but they work for me, but you should also know enough about me by now to know that I'm not going to ignore everything else Lommy does/says because I made a comment about Lommy being innocent because of one word from Day 1.
|
Fair enough, but I still think it's silly to make that kind of generalization.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Not wrong. Not wrong. Not wrong. Wolves give as little detail as they have to, because they're lying during a fake reveal and less details means less likely to get caught. The only reason I said I defended Kath, in the infamous fake ranger reveal, is because I had to since you prevented us from killing her.  |
Less details may mean less likely to get caught, but more details means more likely to be believed.
And to reply to the
Inzil/
Nerwen comment, since my quotes bugged out on me - You're right, I did mention "or save
Inzil". The focus of my suspicion was still on the
Mac-kill attempt, though.
You should reply to some of my other posts,
Boro. I'm trying especially hard to participate today - I did my Grimoire stats and had it brought home to me today that I've been modkilled due to RL issues three (or was it four? I think it was three) times.
Edit: X'ed with
Nerwen,
Sally,
Lottie,
Nogrod,
Lottie.