Hmm... I'm a bit confused over the speculation as I can't see the sense there... Let's make a quick eyeing on the rules first...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by the rules
1 Hunter – she stands with the innocents, and at any point of the game, she can choose people whom she is going to watch and take with her in case she dies. That effectively means that the Hunter will send me a list of three or less names (maximally up to the number of living Werewolves in game), and if she is killed during the Night and there is a Werewolf on the list, the Werewolf who is first on the list will die alongside her; otherwise, nothing happens. If the Hunter is lynched and there is a Werewolf on the list, the Werewolf who is the first on the list will die alongside her; otherwise, the first person who is on the list will die alongside her.
|
Now obviously we wouldn't lynch the hunter if s/he revealed during the Day as there is the possibility of an innocent going down. It would ease our choice though for who to lynch: one less to choose from. The downside would be that the wolves would not kill her/him either so we'd face the "believability problem" once again.
With a rivalling call we'd need to be careful as lynching the wrong one would once again make the possibility of an extra innocent dying possible.
Although to be honest, if a hunter doesn't get it right having three chances out of six possibilities, then it's a bit bad hunting...
But anyway, it's for the hunter (and ranger - they can talk, wasn't it so?) to decide.
EDIT: X'd with Sally... and needs to rethink the scenario she gives...