Heh, one scenario for the hunter to entertain herself with...
Pick anyone you feel as your target A and then
Boro as your target B. Then come open and we'll lynch you.
If A is killed by you as a wolf, we'll lynch
Boro the next Day and win.
If A is not killed by you but
Boro is killed, then the ranger will safeguard A the next Night and we have a known innocent with us tomorrow with a situation of 4-1 (meaning that every innocent knows her/himself + the known innocent = there are two innocents and one wolf for every innocent to choose from).
If we miss it then, it will be two against one on the last Day...
Any ranger-gambles etc. might change the picture of course.
But looking back... as odd... well as reasonable... as it seems...
Boro's coming into the open is actually a good move for a wolf. The risk of us getting them both pinned down with hunter's list of two was probably a too heavy weapon... and he realised that?
So should we just lynch / sacrifice
Boro and be happy with it or should we think the other scenarios? It's getting late here but I will see if I can come up with other, better scenarios before I go to sleep...
Oh
Boro posted...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
I'm doing whatever it takes to prove I'm innocent. Saying I'm innocent won't do it, so I figured throwing my hands up and saying I'm done will. Do whatever you want, you obviously don't need my help, and I can't give it anymore.
|
I just can't see what you mean my friend.
- You don't think you "prove" yourself innocent by voting yourself.
- You don't give up if you're innocent.
- You have better self-esteem & understanding of the number of votes left to understand that as an innocent we'd need you.
So sorry. I'm not buying that.
