Sally talked of the ranger as a
she. Whatever the status of that claim might be, we should take that into consideration. And
Sally didn't give us a name (was wise enough not to).
Now, if the ranger is lynched we lose. It is game over.
If the ranger is killed during the Night we lose before the next Day breaks as well - unless we get a wolf toDay. And if we lynch a female toDay who is not a wolf they have easier task to guess on the ranger the coming Night (as there are less females to choose from). So let us leave them as many females as possible to pick from the coming Night so that there are better chances of them getting it wrong.
So let's lynch a male toDay.
It means either
me
Shasta
Inzil
I know I'm an innocent myself.
I have already said I'm afraid we just can't afford a shot in the dark with trying
Shasta. Although now seeing
Shasta posting and actually contesting the whole "female-ranger" idea makes me think again... bah, I thought I could get to bed now.
Heh, as soon I started to feel better about
wilwa - because of realising her concern about
Sally revealing early enough so that the wolves couldn't mess the votes yesterDay -
Shasta says
wilwa was backpedalling on the ranger-reveal -issue, which is not true - while it could be argued
Inzil did that, and
Shasta's "weak suspicion" "but then I think Inzil is fishy too" looks very much like a wolf-on-wolf suspicion.
I do think
Inzil has been trying to capitulate on the general suspicions on me toDay - the wolves know the situation and just one innocent lynch will give them great chances of winning the game on the coming Night. Also the way he has done that has been outright twisting the facts (check my posts with real evidence) and I do suspect he tried to out our ranger for the death of us innocents, and when caught, tried to lie to get away with it (check my posts for original quotes showing the difference between what he said and what he claimed he said).
Okay. Needs a moment of thought before voting...
EDIT: mentioning this now... X'd with Inzil.