Quote:
Originally Posted by wilwarin538
I agree with the submarine thing, someone could very well be innocent but if they don't stand out in anyone's mind then they won't get votes, and then they're done for.
|
And that's the ingenuinity of this game! If this works (remains to be seen), I'll be suggesting we make this kind of games more often as now it seems that one really needs to post to stay on with the game.
But just an idea then.
Now
Sally seemed to request we highlight our votes of confidence.
So how about we come up with a marking of our own to indicate whom everyone of us would like to lynch? I think it would be a good idea if everyone also told the others whom they would like to see lynched already on this Day - and hopefully also why. In that way we could lessen the erratic nature of the last hour choices a little bit more?
Especially if we have people who can only turn out at the last moments of the Day they would have it easier just scrolling the thread and see why some people would like to see some others lynched (if people write long posts and their points are just in the middle of them unmarked a fast skimmer might just miss them).
If someone doesn't get that highlight-rule they might go for the traditional bolding with two pluses, so we should have to come up with some other solution for our unofficial lynch-votes.
How about we marked them like this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by being an example
-- Nogrod
or
lynch Nogrod
|
Both would be clear, visible and still no one could mess it up with a vote of confidence (with two pluses & highlighting)?
What do you think?