Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
I'm not entirely sure as to why people are thinking this is way different than "normal". Quite often, when people vote - it comes down to a "whomever is left".
People will makes lists of their thoughts on every player, putting into categories of "innocentish, won't lynch, slightly suspicious.." etc. Then voting for a person whom either they find suspicious, or whomever is "left over" and they've "no idea about".
|
You have a point there– at least if you're talking about Day Ones only. After that we generally have more to go on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
Here, we are just placing our votes with/on/for people whom we want to keep around. Not entirely different than making lists. By voting for whom you want to keep around, it already shows whom you may think is suspicious indirectly.
|
But much too indirectly– at least in this stage of the game, when there are so many players. The big problem we have is that the lynch-result may not give us much information– the wolves can help get an ordo lynched simply by doing
nothing, and then claim they never suspected the victim at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the phantom
Extra note: Would you stop with the "here and reading" announcements? I've seen several of those (Wilwa, Nerwen, and Loslote, maybe more), and you don't seem to realize that not everyone is allowed to say that (unless you are within an hour of the deadline).
|
*has sudden urge to spam the thread with 500 "here and reading" posts*
EDIT:X'd with a host.