I'd like to comment on the several people toDay who are expressing surprise or confusion where I just don't think it's warranted.
Nienna at #226
"has stopped having any sort of idea what is going on". (May be just be referring to
Sally's Game reference, however).
Sally at #229 wants to know:
Quote:
|
what the heck happened at the end of the Day yesterDay? Don't get me wrong, yay dead cobbler, but a dead cobbler is not a dead wolf. Sally demands an....an expla.....explanat....some country.....
|
(Hmmn. Possible hint of wolfish
chagrin there?)
Sally, really, what do you
mean, "what the heck happened?"
Lommy at #235 is surprised that
Fea was the cobbler and had seen no connection between
Lottie and
Boro.
Agan at #247 agrees with her on both points.
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lommy
First off, I'm quite surprised Fea turned out to be the cobbler.
|
Me too but I'm happy she was lynched in the end. That's what happens when you think you know better what Fea is doing...
(...)
I don't think the connection was that obvious either. While skimming through the thread in the night I noticed there might be something between them, but I didn't actually think they were the Shirriffs
|
Now, firstly, I just can't see why it's so surprising that someone who acted in a typically cobbleresque manner turned out to be, in fact, the cobbler. I know
Lommy said she thought
Lottie might be the cobbler yesterDay, and it was something that crossed my mind in the early part of the Day– but
Fea should have been, it seems to me, a clear runner-up at least.
Secondly– I may of course be developing
Nogroditis– but
I'm surprised anyone
didn't see a possible connection between
Boro and
Lottie after the end of yesterDay– and having seen it, the idea that they might be the Shirriffs is a logical next step. I mean, it wasn't the only thing that occurred to me– but to say you never noticed, or even more, that you did, but never thought of them being the Shirriffs seems a little disingenuous.
EIDT:X'd since
Legate.
EDIT2: word left out.