Quote:
Originally Posted by Nienna
Ooops sorry dear it must have gotten lost in the shuffle. Mira's Day One participation are generally just banter and she has a tendency to air on the side of defensiveness where her "people" are concerned in the early stages(by "people" I mean mainly her RL friends). So to me her measly 3 posts yesterDay were very Mira-esque.
|
Okay thanks. I haven't changed my mind about her
ww suspicion, but I'd like to hear more from her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inziladun
Yes and no. If it's early in the game, I'd say the wolves are highly unlikely to make a gamble like that. Later on, however, maybe.
|
Nope, they can do it as early as on day 1 if their fellow comes under heavy suspicion (or if they think there's no chance that their fellow is lynched). It's happened before and will continue to happen because it's just so darn convenient for the wolves.
Quote:
I found ww's behaviour unnerving also, and Agan comes across as somewhat overly agressive here.
|
Seriously it was a newbie's first post.
Quote:
Those whom she suspects. All this seems fairly reasonable, except Morsul on the suspect list because of his 'style', whereas later she seem to want to give Lottie an allowance for the same thing.
|
Not the same thing because their styles are different.
Morsul's struck me as opportunistic whereas
Lottie was mostly just too over-confident to my liking.
Quote:
She doesn't have Nerwen on her 'guilty' list, which makes me think Agan looks better there. It would have been all too easy to keep up that suspicion, if Agan was a wolf.
|
No it wouldn't. If
Nerwen had given me a reason to suspect her beyond her treatment of
ww, I would have - regardless of my role.
Quote:
I've done that before, and been wrong.
|
Me too and that's why I said
Lommy and
Mac may laugh at me (they both have been targets for my forceful and unjust attacks more than once

).
Quote:
Going to post it in the BD Dreams?
|
Nope because as long as the game is running I'm not going to talk of it outside of the game thread. Who knows, I might be the seer who just dreamed of
Wolfziladun, or it might be a lie I told for a reason unknown to you.

In any case, I can't remember anything more about the dream so I don't think I will even after the game is over.
Quote:
I don't think I ever said Legate and Lommy were not suspicious, but as I looked back over things I couldn't find much else, beyond their votes for Lottie, that pointed to which of them, if either, was the more likely wolf.
|
Yes but what was so suspicious about the
Lottie-wagon in the first place? You just decided it was fishy but when looking at the
Lottie-voters, none of them was suspicious enough to receive your vote. Usually people and their reasons for voting make a bandwagon suspicious, not the other way round.
Quote:
I don't see how not wanting to waste a tool that could just as easily be used against wolves as to aid them, is a mark of evil.
|
By itself it's not, but I think it's far more likely that the wolves use their retraction to kill an innocent than the other way round. Yeah I know they can be useful to the innocents too, but their benefit for the wolves is more imminent.
Quote:
That line of reasoning from ww is very poor coming from an innocent. But you don't disagree?
|
What I don't disagree about is that
Brinn is a good player and, if a wolf, asset to the wolf team (I've been a wolf with her and heck she's brilliant). I can hardly disagree (in the sense I understand the word) on what
ww claims to be the reason for his vote.
Quote:
Conclusion? As with Glirdan, I've found myself agreeing with some of the things she's said.
|
Most of the things, I would say.
Quote:
I think I'm on the fence for the moment, but if she starts in on people who aren't willing to dump their retractables that could change.
|
I don't like that comment. I wasn't planning to do it, but that looks too much like a threat. Yeah yeah I might be totally overestimating how important the wolves consider the retrackies, but still.
I think
sally should be suspected more often if it gets her to speak seriously. :-p