Arg, no one's had a look at
Izzy's or
Sally's posts (in the case of
Sally, Day1 posts) and I feel that'd be useful, but I don't have time to do it now because I've used all my day seeing (three different) friends (separately) instead of playing ww and it's midnight and I have to wake up at 9 so I'd like to go to sleep in an hour...
Anyway, at this point, I'm pretty sure I'm going to vote
Glirdan. He's my top suspect atm and his death would reveal things, and once he's dead he won't at least be bugging me anymore.
Comments...
Skip is starting to worry me. First he insisted
Glirdan was an active part of lynching
Sally (which he wasn't), now he's questioning people's motives to vote him and considering the suspicions against him weak. I think I at least have pretty much evidence already, all his interactions with
Sally yesterDay plus the things I mentioned in my vote post yesterDay. (I don't get it why it was bad reasoning for a vote. I thought it made a lot of sense, and I had elaborated on most of the points earlier in my long analysis post.) And then on top of that
Skip concludes he is not sure about
Glirdan, but he's not his top suspect. Fishy. If
Glirdan is furry like I assume, I would look at
Skip next, but if he's innocent, then I'm just confused.
Nerwen is also starting to worry me. The current situation looks awfully much to me like
Sally and
Glirdy are two of her fellows and she's doing some pretty drastic moves to make herself look good. I don't have any factual arguments, but somehow the calm rationality in which she presented/presents points against them makes me feel that she knows more than us others, and it's quite disturbing...
I'm totally disagreeing with
Shasta over all kinds of things but it actually makes me think he's innocent. No wolf would surely sport such original and unpopular opinions about
everything? He seems to think differently than the rest of us.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Loslote
Anyway, though, my point is that waking up the known innocent from blind suspicion is not a good move for a wolf to make, but it is a good move for an innocent.
|
I disagree - waking a known innocent up like that would make the wolf seem better, and if the known innocent's suspicions were directed to ward the wolf's fellows, it would be even profitable.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greenie
A technical point: getting a wolf lynched usually requires a bandwagon. Just saying.
|
Love ya! <3<3<3 (that was the cutest thing I've heard anyone say in ww for a while
)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
In theory, the fact that winty got confused about sally's gender suggests he's innocent. But then, the nickname sally is rather feminine...
|
Yes, in theory, but in a rather lousy theory. I was once wolves with a newbie named
xyzzy (anybody remember him?) and I told him he shouldn't know too much of me since we didn't know before at all so I told him not to for example use the name "Lommy" of me before somebody else does etc. He took my advice very seriously and actually a lot further, he pretended he had no idea who the nickname referred to and confused my gender at some point too, so when I was lynched it took quite long for the village to find out he was my fellow because he seemed to know so little of me... So I do not trust ignorant-seeming newbies!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
I don't quite get Green's Nog suspicion.
|
She always suspects him, you know.
edit: eww, xed with a lot (everyone after Agan's vote post)