Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
Shasta.
How in the world can you claim that an OMGUS vote is not game related; when simply the act of voting someone for voting for you - is game related. Voting a person with the reason that they punched you in the arm the day before at school.. or something like that would be more considered not game related. But the mere act of placing a vote for someone is game related. Arguably the most 'game related' act of the game. Savvy?
|
How dare I get into semantics with you...
Okay. Yes, voting is game related. However, the reason for the vote (in this case, because someone else voted you first) is not related to someone's role, or whether or not someone is suspicious - it's not related to the game at all. Get it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
You went into your analysis with Paranoia pegged as the WereBorg; and thusly essentially cherry picked the actions/"attitudes" which fit your theory.
|
No, I didn't. I'm honestly not sure what else to say here, other than that you're wrong.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
Your entire wording here stinks. A lot. You are personalizing the WereBorg.
|
So? Sure, I could be wrong, and the Bear could be just as powerful as a lone Morph. But given all the secret roles and power twists in this game, I sincerely doubt it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
"plus the Morph's only got their kill left"
The way you said this, was as if they started with more. 'only' specifically.
|
The Morphs started with a numerical advantage - I don't see them starting with anything else. If I was unclear in my wording, I apologize.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
So you admit to strategizing your vote.. and nonetheless attempting to work with one of your chief suspects? Very town of you.
|
In a three-party game? Sure, why not? I don't see what's so particularly suspicious about it.
Pitch was getting ready to have to leave, and in essence would have thrown away his vote - so I put it to use on my other suspect. Big deal. Yes, in order to get
Pitch's vote on
Paranoia, I had to vote before
Paranoia could defend himself, and for that I apologize, but it doesn't change my suspicion of him, and he could very well convince others of his innocence anyway.
Pitch already has more votes than he does.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
Yes, past games are meta. However YOU brought it up - and used it is a possible point against him. If it didn't matter because it was meta - you never would of brought it up in the first place. But the fact that you mentioned it in your analysis of him; implies that you used it in your thought process.
|
Insofar as I was going through each of
Paranoia's posts and typing up my thoughts as I thought them, stream-of-consciousness style, then yes, I used it in my thought process. However, I also recognized it for what it was and acted accordingly - you can feel free to disregard that statement if you wish. It doesn't diminish the validity of my other points.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
You also attribute the WereBorg attitudes to Paranoia, from what I gather - past games. Meta, no? HasParanoia seen a WereBorg before? How do you reconcile that with your theory? That since Paranoia has not seen a WereBorg- would therefore by default fit the 'standardized' actions of what a wereBorg would/n't do?
|
In that one point, yes. I have plenty of others, I think. And has
Paranoia been a lone baddie before? Yes, he has. That's not a point in favor of or against him, it's an answer to your question.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
Considering that part of your theory rests on the Assassin incapable of harming the WereBorg - why have you not asked the mod?
|
Because I thought it was obvious.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Izzy
Hit close to your WereBorg role name Shasta?
|
No.
I kind of translate this universe to Star Trek (even though I'm not familiar with it overmuch) and I seem to recall there being Borg in StarTrek... so was wondering if you had slipped.