Day one voting:
Eonwe ->
Glirdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eonwe
So far, e's jus' been latchin' on t' what's been said, an' twistin' it in 'is own way.
|
Known innocent, fair enough.
Wilwa ->
Eonwe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilwa
He seems really defensive over fairly small comments. For example:
|
Reasonable sounding and I agreed with her at the time - could just as easily be fishy or ordinary, doesn't tell much.
Morsul ->
Nerwen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morsul
Based on She's posted the most and With her Piratey talk confused me...
|
I don't approve of this, as I mentioned before, but that's because I don't really consider it good form, not because it's necessarily suspicious. It's actually pretty
Morsul-ish and, again, doesn't tell us much.
Rikae ->
Morsul
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rikae
Because if you're going to make a random vote, make a random vote, but explaining your vote in a way that seems to apply to another person (it seems as though he thinks he's voting for Blind Guardian)? Such laziness deserves a reprimand.
|
Basically a throwaway vote/making a point, due to misgivings about voting Eonwe or Glirdy.
Inzil->
Eonwe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inzil
Eönwë's edginess gives him the worst cast. I also recall the way he kept saying things to the effect of "How do we get the Fishmen?" "Let's talk about how to get the Fishmen." I tend to see that as a sign of evil intent.
|
Again looks like a fairly solid argument based on the little we had to go on. The placement is maybe somewhat worrying, since it's the second vote for
Eonwe; certainly more worrying if
Glirdan,
Nerwen or
Morsul is evil. If not, then it would tend to make
Inzil look more innocentish in my eyes, since I doubt
Fishzil would want to be responsible for getting the
Eonwe-wagon rolling.
Shasta ->
Morsul
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasta
I think Eonwe's getting a little too much suspicion at the moment. Could be wolf-on-wolf done too well, or there could be wolvery behind it. I don't think I'll be voting him. Nerwen and Glirdan seem okay to me, so really, my only other option is -
++Morsul
|
On second thought, this doesn't look terribly bad, although in
Shasta's position here I wouldn't necessarily limit my options to those who already had votes. I am interested in knowing why he finds
Glirdan and
Nerwen innocentish, though.
Autume ->
Morsul
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autume
I really don't feel like putting in another vote for Eonwe and making that a bandwagon. Unless you call two votes a bandwagon in which case I don't feel comfortable jumping on that bandwagon.
I'm really not comfortable with what Morsul did, and I have no problem voting for him. Since I need to put my vote in:
|
Known cobbler - seems to have thought
Eonwe was evil.
Blind Guardian ->
Morsul
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG
I have a bad feeling about this but...
++Morsul
For the above stated reasons. Tired...
|
However, I couldn't find the "above stated reasons".
BG's last post was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG
1Am forum time?!?! That's 11 here! Woo...this is weird. I should start looking for someone to vote for -_-
|
-which has a really bad ring to it, but I'll try not to be biased by that, since I would generally expect a wolf to be careful
not to say such bad-sounding things. I can only assume
BG means the reasons stated above by other people... care to explain,
Guardian?
Nerwen -
Eonwe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Morsul's vote be scuvy, 'tis for sure, but
++Eonwe
be actin' more like as he have summat to hide.
'Tis the best I can do, shipmates.
|
I orignially found the last remark cobblerish, but that's not possible. Certainly an evil
Morsul would reflect very badly on
Nerwen here - perhaps too badly, as I don't think an evil
Nerwen would save a comrade so obviously. "Something to hide" could, of course, always be giftedness, so it's possible
Nerwen chose what she thought was a gifted for lynching.
Mac ->
Eonwe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac
The reasons given for Morsul-votes deserve some examination toMorrow. There's something mighty fishy going on.
|
Apparently he votes
Eonwe because he feels the
Morsul-voters are a rescue party? Although this is a decent enough reason, it would also have been an excellent place for a wolf to hide, playing off what he may have recognized as cobblery somewhere in the
Morsul-voting group. I'll be interested in reading his analysis.
Glirdan -> Eonwe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glirdan
Between him and Morsul, my gut is telling me to vote for him. He's been overly defensive about some of the smallest things and just seems the fishier out of the two. I've seen Morsul pull this one post and vote thing before and it usually turns out that he's innocent.
|
Nothing much to say -
Eonwe is already in the lead at this point, and
Glirdan's points, though reasonable, have already been said by others. A very safe vote, I'd say.
Elf-Warrior -> Eonwe
Quote:
Originally Posted by EW
Well, I don't think Morsul is suspicious, but I think Eönwë is somewhat suspicious. The thing about fish bein' still awake after a night of killing seems to me to be an unjustified application of the game mechanics to real life.
|
Same as with
Glirdan, although even more pointless.
EW seems to be missing the point on the "rule of three" thing, at least as I understand it: I always thought the idea was that wolves were anxious to post and influence the day's analysis/show how helpful they are early in the Day. This talk of unfair meta-reasoning reads a bit fishy, too. I wouldn't necessarily expect an ordo to read
Eonwe and
Nerwen's talk of excited baddies in this way, somehow.
Seems as though we either have an evil
Morsul, a misguided cobbler, and a couple of wolves among the
Eonwe-voters (
Mac?
Glirdan?
EW?) or an evil
Shasta or
BG (but I highly doubt both) and an innocent
Morsul, in which case
Mac's analysis will be especially interesting. Morsul's role would be enlightening, but then again, there's some very weakly reasoned voting in the later
Eonwe-wagon that has me worried.