Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Quote:
Originally Posted by tp
The reason for accusing her is her first post, in which she says "What the Hades is going on here?"
|
Yes. And it is interesting that from all the 20 characters she picked up one of the two God-wolfs who had to really desperately contact their lover as early as possible. To be fair, Hades as a random-choice is not too bad (look at the carnage that is coming!). But Zeus would be the most understandable (as the King of the Gods), and also Ares (there's a war brewing on here!), Pallas Athene (We need your wisdom to solve this!), Apollo (We need your keen eyes to help us!), Eros (Oh, let love prevail insterad of anger!)... you see it?
So the choice could be a random-one an innocent takes (count in name-recognition and relevance of the God's abilities to the situation), but it is one of many choices an innocent might have had - and the pick just happened to be the one wolf who needs to send a message to his lover! |
Oh, for Zeus's sake! Stop. Repeating. That.
Yes, everybody has heard the "
Nerwen could be Hades hinting argument". You weren't the one to come up with it, either, so stop acting like you're doing something terribly clever, that nobody else has thought of. Yes (as I realised after the event) that mention of Hades
could, in principle, have been a hint.
But it wasn't. That's all there is to say. I am not Hades, and that comment was not meant to be a hint of any kind, just colour.
People aren't saying "the argument is rubbish", no, they're saying, "yes, it's an argument, but I don't agree with it because of such-and-such". Which is an entirely valid response.
And
Greenie is right: you've by and large simply refused to consider alternative points of view– in fact you seem to be taking them as signs of guilt. What, for instance, is this talk of
tp "framing"
Mac?
I don't agree with the case he made, by the way, but do you understand that your use of "framing" there is an accusation? Did you mean it to be?
EDIT:X'd with
Wilwa and
Lalaith.