Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Little Green
I don't have time to go and check it right now so I ask: wouldn't voting for a packmate be an especially good idea if an innocent was a certain lynch?
|
Maybe, but if so, that would incriminate Eomer's voting for you more than my voting for Eomer. When Eomer voted for you, there was no support for that lynch. When I voted for Eomer, there was considerable support for his lynch. He would've been lynched if Pitchie and Sally hadn't both missed the DL.
|
But,
Lottie, did you notice that
Sally's reasoning is completely the other way round? She regards
Wilwa as having been doomed by the time you voted, and argues from that that your vote on
Eomer couldn't have been wolf-on-wolf:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sally
Also, silly me, I just saw/remembered that Lottie voted for Eomer. If they were packmates, she'd be headdesking pretty hard right now. I'm fairly certain she wouldn't wolf-on-wolf at that stage, not when Wilwa was such a certain lynch. There'd be no reason for it and I can't see Lottie doing it anyway.
|
So, that really doesn't make that much sense. She's talking as though wolf-on-wolf is something you
only do when your packmate's clearly for it anyway– but she ought to know that's not so.