Quote:
Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim
Ok Loslote, you're being pretty obvious. I just hope the village doesn't fall for it.
A thousand times more sure about Eomer, eh? That's only meaning one thing.
Clearly, I can see your game, though no-one else will -- unless you-know-who (and I ain't talking Voldemort) steps forward - not sure if that's wise yet though.
|
What, you think I'm hinting at being the Seer or something? I'm not the Seer, I'll get that out of the way right now. By 'thousand times more sure', I meant that, compared to my almost assurance of your guilt, my suspicion of
Agan is barely acknowledgeable.
Quote:
Nerwen's remark was interesting too. She said there's 3 baddies to 4 innocents. There's no way she doesn't realise that the cobbler could be gone already, unless she is the cobbler; but why would she reveal as the cobbler right now? She could be manipulating us to deduce that she is the cobbler, so we don't 'waste' a kill on her.
Worrying. What does everybod else think about that? Or have I misread it?
|
Erm...because
Zil announces the roles of the dead people, and there hasn't been a 'cobbler' among the list of the dead.
Quote:
I note Loslote gives a  in response. Too daring?
|
What's this now? Daring how? Did I hint again without knowing it? I thought I was simply pointing out that we can't take the Seer's innocents at face value.
EDIT: Just realized I bolded one of the quotes instead of quoting it. Fixed.