Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastanis Althreduin
let me state that both Sally and Lottie voted for you before you even showed up, which means they had no in-game basis for voting you,
|
This is not even true,
Shasticle. You were there at the time, too. Surely you remember that
tp was very much around before I voted? More so, in fact, than anyone else?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
Sally voted for you in her first post of the game, second over all. Loslote's was the 17th of the Day. Neither had even given the Day a chance to get rolling before tossing their vote away. Loslote even later asks Nerwen how she could distrust you, given the only banter posts. How could one trust only on banter posts?
|
I trusted him to be himself, which meant that he was going to be manipulative, not manipulated. I don't mind accidentally putting a SoE in power nearly as much as putting someone in power who is going to let the SoE walk over them. You see, if the SoE is in power, they have to behave themselves. They're in the spotlight. If someone who is going to let the SoE walk over them is in power, they get burned, not the SoE who manipulated them. Better to have the manipulators in full view, being forced to take responsibilty for their own actions. No, I didn't - and don't, fully - trust
The Puddingtom. But I don't need to in order to know that he ought to be in power. He ought to have the chance to actually make good on his promises, not hide behind the mask that is his lack of power.
EDIT: xed with Vanilwuffin and Feanorc The Bemoaned