Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Phantom
Your response has nothing to do with my statement. I did not say L & S had the same number of posts to read over when they voted, but rather that they knew the same exact amount when they voted. Actual knowledge. Something you can bank on. Reading through five pages of "I don't like those early votes!" and "I don't like Phantom!" and "You're wrong!" and "Let's not split votes!" does not qualify as gaining actual real knowledge. You can try and form a hunch based upon such things, but that is all.
|
You can't simply disregard what can be gained by reading the things that people say, either. I simply do not understand why you're doing so, and saying that we should do the same.
Legate's #206 makes me uneasy - it's a relatively large post that says nothing but the obvious, as if he's participating but not really.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
I'm glad Shasta has taken up me and Greenie's crusade against phantom's silly arguments so I don't need to concentrate on it any longer, haha.
|
Pish. "Taken up"? I believe I started the whole thing, thank you very much.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rune
I love it my self, I seldom make as much sense as in that particular post. Of course this is because I did not write that post. . . You are infact basing your opinion of me on something Folwren said.
|
...
...
...
Whoops. I feel like a lamebrain now, for sure.
Edit: X'ed with
phorc.