|
Kath
In her post 460 where she analyzes a lot of people, I think she went to good lengths to figure each person out and her summaries make sense. In 461, she voiced her conclusions. Three of her four unknowns have been proven to be innocent. One of of her leaning towards guilty has been proven innocent, and Inzil is the second one. So far, she looks fine to me...
Problem...she voted for Inzil to be rep the next day....she says he is posting well... on the otherhand, I know that, being a giftedless innocent, one's mind can easily be changed from thinking someone guilty to thinking they're innocent and vice-versa, so maybe it's not a problem.
I'm curious about if she can pinpoint her gut feeling about Rune. Kath? If you're around will you explain?
And that's all I've got on her. She seems alright to me.
Hey, look! I cross posted with Kath herself...and Legate.
__________________
A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading. - C.S. Lewis
|