Well, this was actually meant to be part of the same post as the last, but then I decided to split them, so just assume they're linked as one.
I've been trying to find stuff (good or bad) about
Inzil, but the problem is that I can't, because there's not much I can say. He's far too slippery, which is not good at all. There's nothing really that can be taken as a strong sign of innocence or evilness, and the only real way to judge him is to look at his links with other people.
That's why I've chosen
the phantom. Now, let's assume that he's evil (see last post) and in league with
the phantom. Consider these under this light:
- He is the first to show dissent against everyone voting phantom (#6). So obviously, this would be a good way to start an argument without actually suspecting someone.
- Later on he says "I don't know whether tp is a SoE, but I flat-out disagree with him on this" (#225)And that generally sums up his approach to the phantom. Arguing with him but not suspecting him. A perfect way to distance yourselves and not get either of you in trouble (i.e., danger of lynching). And these sorts of arguments generally look innocent.
- Votes Boro for rep on Day 1, cementing the above comment.
- "Why is the phantom still alive?" The easiest way to suspect someone without giving evidence or making anyone seem too evil.
He also only once gives out clear suspicions of everyone. On Day 2.
The link also continues (Though weaker) throughout the rest of the game, but I'm too tired to look in more detail at the rest right now.
Besides, I get the feeling that really, one of them is probably evil, while the other might not necessarily be. If this is the case, I suspect that
Inziladun slowly tried to associate himself with
phantom, so that he could take him down with him if he looked guilty.
Or maybe I'm just over-thinking.
edit: fell asleep at my keyboard. x-ed since my last post.