First off, let me say that I too am always amused when
Inzil plays WW at work.
Inzil starts off on day 1 by saying that a suspected cobbler should be lynched in absence of a lupine target. I like it, but it doesn't tell me anything about his role because I pursue my tirade against cobblers even if I'm one, or a wolf, myself. He also thinks that a BW lynch is okay if we don't have other strong suspects because it might be difficult to leave her to Tom entirely, but she shouldn't be our priority. I'm inclined to agree, mostly because we can't know who Tom has already checked.
He questions
Volo for saying the BW will have educated hunches about the roles, says he finds him shifty, and states he doesn't like the bandwagon against me. He considered voting
Volo (who hadn't played in a long time, though) or
Eomer. In the end he voted for
Glirdan (who had a nervy edge to his posts).
On day 2, he said
Nog as a wolfkill was a possibility, but he didn't see why his suspicion of me stood out from the others - also
Eomer's suspicion seemed pretty explicit, while
Nog had said I was the
cobbler.
He analyses the votes, saying he would've expected
Eomer of the Wargs at least to qualify his with a gut feeling;
sally posted little so it's hard to say if her reasons were opportunistic (for the sake of consistency I should probably ask what makes a vote opportunistic, but as I've said of
sally's vote before, it looked like she simply didn't care who got lynched); points out that to
Form, entertaining was more valuable than useful;
wilwa's reasons for her vote were better than
Kath's (who voted for her for a lack of reasoning).
Then he argues with
Shasta on whether
Aganwolf would've been more likely to target
Nog or
Eomer, saying that a wolf is usually more worried of someone who votes for her for little or no reason than of someone who has an actual case against her.
Shasta says
Inzil was defending
Nog but I don't think so, in my opinion he had a fair point. Still, I don't think the argument makes either of them look very bad, it looks more like they had differences in views and the argument just escalated.
He keeps questioning
Volo for his weird suspicion of me and points out that on day 1 he voted for someone
Nog was suspicious of even though he (according to himself) thought
Nog could be a wolf. He considers voting for
Eomer or
Volo again, but says
EW's vote for
Eomer doesn't look too good, either.
Shasta is either evil, insane or both, and he could possibly vote for
Form too. In the end he gave
Volo his third vote (just before his reveal). In her vote analysis,
Nerwen says
Inzil had only said
Volo pinged his radar, but he had in fact been quite consistent with his suspicion since day 1.
Today he wonders if
Shasta might be Ferny. That's possible I guess. It just seemed so useless to suggest we try to figure out whom the wolves targeted. Also,
Eomer looks shady although we can't know if Tom targeted him or not. I agree, especially after his last posts.
I wonder if I should be concerned about
Inzil because he is reasonable and makes sense - almost too much so.
Anyway I don't find him suspicious at all at the moment.