Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
I will more or less have to vote randomly again today as I'm going to be swamped with busyness for the remainder of the week, as I'm needed to moderate for this academic/jeopardy-like tournament area schools are competing in.
So, with my apologies of apalling inactivity and to to the Master Mod. I may be on late may not...
++Lommy
This logic just seems all too suspicious, and rather clever. Lommy's in fact pointing attention to the strange Nerwen votes, which she herself was a part of. It looks like an attempt to be fair and reasonable by drawing suspicion on something she did, in an attempt to exonerate herself from voting Nerwen.
|
I don't really follow the line of reasoning here. I thought
Lommy was just saying in general that she thought analysing the Day 1 votes would have limited value because most were so ill-reasoned as to seem nearly random. I didn't pick up anything furry there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim
Should we just accept that we have to hunt wolves or should we perhaps think about lynching our Hunter today? It guarantees that the Heir becomes another Hunter, and it takes a shot at killing someone else at the same time. Could be a wolf, could not; but it's the same chance as getting a wolf as our lynching would be, and it gets us the Heir as guaranteed.
|
I might support this, at this point. In addition to giving the chance of hitting a wolf and putting the Heir on the innocent side, there's something else I hadn't considered before: it would
also be the only way we'd have of knowing for certain whether a revealed Gifted was legitimate or not, since obviously only the real Hunter will be able to take someone with him. The Heir replacing any other role leaves a lot of room for doubt as to the alignment of the one killed, unless the wolves Night-kill our first Gifted. If that happened, the most we'd know is that the deceased was innocent.