This actually makes me think very suspicious of Legate. After a lonf absence he decides to make this his point? Really? Someone with his brains and experience would have done differently being an ordinary innocent:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Leg
I mean, since when has Cobbler been "innocent"? Don't give us that: Rubbish and more rubbish. No, I don't trust Nog, not after this on top of everything. This-is-weird.
|
Somehow I'm feeling this is not only about semantics... but let me make my understanding clear - and then you can judge the merit of this.
In a village, there are
innocents and
wolves. And then there are
gifteds who are innocents but with a special role. At some time during the history of the WW in the 'Downs the
cobblers were introduced, but they are
counted as innocents as they
are not wolves (the winning-tallies count the cobblers as innocents when calculating the winning conditions).
So speaking about an "ordo" means an ordinary innocent aka. having no role.
Speaking of an "innocent" means a non-wolf.
Gifteds and wolves are self-explicating.
But the real problem with
Legate's post is not this. It is the fact he uses that false point as grounds of suspicion.
There may be different interpretations to the terms to be sure as there are different generations of werewolf-players around, but taking this kind of thing and stating it's "rubbish" and a reason to suspect someone feels pretty awkward, well plain evil.
I mean what
Mänwe was is not a big thing toDay as we have no way of checking it toDay.