The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum - View Single Post - Mandos Thread: DEAD ONLY!

Shastanis Althreduin · 01-29-2011, 05:16 PM

Agan's bluff occured in #354. Phantom references it exclusively in #356 (as in, the entire post is about it). Your post #357 is one I'm willing to believe you made soon after, and I'm even willing to buy that you didn't go back and read Agan's and Phantom's posts. What I'm not buying is that you also ignored Fea's #358, Ang's #362, Wilwa's #363, and even if you never went back and read those after having posted your #364, you never acknowledged Phantom's point in #365 about a coded Agan-hint, and you continued to ignore continued references to the trap in Agan's #366, Mith's #367, Wilwa's veiled reference in #368 ("it's pretty clear he's not the Seer"), Ang's #371... even though you posted after that at #374, in response to Phantom's post (the reason I say you never acknowledged the point is that you didn't respond to the difference between 'hint' and 'code' - which Phantom himself mentions in #376.) Agan makes known that she's bluffing in #378, and you didn't even acknowledge that. Loslote makes yet another reference to it in #388 and Agan specifically re-mentions it in #394.

I find it extremely hard to believe you failed to see all of this.

And added to that, you claim to have dreamt of Agan. I'm sure you can see that you said nothing about her being a Lover before her reveal (which is good), but you can also see that does nothing to prove that you're the seer. The fact that you placed Agan high on your list doesn't mean much - it could easily be argued that you, as a cobbler, were putting up people you found innocent as suggestions for wolf-kills - "Maybe if enough people find person X innocent, the wolves will go after them!" It certainly doesn't add to your credibility as much as you seem to think it does. I really am sorry - I was also probably over-harsh, dying early with a role tends to make me mad... but then again, you do tend to bash me after I'm dead. "Oh, Shasta played stupidly, it's his own fault he's dead," et cetera, things you'd probably never say if I was alive to refute them. You really did hurt my feelings, quite a lot - and this isn't the first game you've done so, either.

TL;DR - I'm sorry, but I still can't believe you're the Seer.

01-29-2011, 05:16 PM	#76
Shastanis Althreduin Werewolf Psychic Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: In fire, water, earth, and air. But mostly water. Posts: 2,832	Agan's bluff occured in #354. Phantom references it exclusively in #356 (as in, the entire post is about it). Your post #357 is one I'm willing to believe you made soon after, and I'm even willing to buy that you didn't go back and read Agan's and Phantom's posts. What I'm not buying is that you also ignored Fea's #358, Ang's #362, Wilwa's #363, and even if you never went back and read those after having posted your #364, you never acknowledged Phantom's point in #365 about a coded Agan-hint, and you continued to ignore continued references to the trap in Agan's #366, Mith's #367, Wilwa's veiled reference in #368 ("it's pretty clear he's not the Seer"), Ang's #371... even though you posted after that at #374, in response to Phantom's post (the reason I say you never acknowledged the point is that you didn't respond to the difference between 'hint' and 'code' - which Phantom himself mentions in #376.) Agan makes known that she's bluffing in #378, and you didn't even acknowledge that. Loslote makes yet another reference to it in #388 and Agan specifically re-mentions it in #394. I find it extremely hard to believe you failed to see all of this. And added to that, you claim to have dreamt of Agan. I'm sure you can see that you said nothing about her being a Lover before her reveal (which is good), but you can also see that does nothing to prove that you're the seer. The fact that you placed Agan high on your list doesn't mean much - it could easily be argued that you, as a cobbler, were putting up people you found innocent as suggestions for wolf-kills - "Maybe if enough people find person X innocent, the wolves will go after them!" It certainly doesn't add to your credibility as much as you seem to think it does. I really am sorry - I was also probably over-harsh, dying early with a role tends to make me mad... but then again, you do tend to bash me after I'm dead. "Oh, Shasta played stupidly, it's his own fault he's dead," et cetera, things you'd probably never say if I was alive to refute them. You really did hurt my feelings, quite a lot - and this isn't the first game you've done so, either. TL;DR - I'm sorry, but I still can't believe you're the Seer. __________________ Shasta– ... However, if he's innocent his famous clairvoyant powers must be taking the week off. Meanwhile, the Night-kills have been awfully effective– almost like we're dealing with a psychic wolf... - Nerwen, WW LXXV