Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
It is interesting that Kit decided to concentrate her effort toDay (well, thus far) into close-reading those who got LottieWolf lynched. Now wolf-on-wolf votes do happen every now and then and I'm not suggesting some people should be made immune or putting them beyond suspicion just because they voted / lynched a wolf. But Kit's priorities look interesting: like she wishes to turn the discussion away form somewhere else?
Another interesting thing. Lottie tends to get lynched on D1 more often than the average player. Therefore I was not suspicious of her at first when the suspicions started to gather around her as I thoguht it's just her normal "looking suspicious" -behaviour - and I have been lynching her on D1's quite a few times already. But then I saw that slip regarding Kitanna - and that really started to make me suspect her for real.
Now if I'm right about it, that I suspected Lottie from the correct reason, then it would point to Kitanna being a second baddie.
|
Are you talking about
Lottie's claim that she "didn't know
Kit was playing"? I don't know– it
was, of course, suspicious, with hindsight– but it might have been meant as a more general "look at me, I'm a clueless innocent" ploy, rather than having anything to do with
Kit herself. On the other hand (or paw)
Lottie did make quite a point of it: at
#106 she says,
Did I miss something? I could well have - I totally forgot Kit was playing at all, I might have forgotten there was a cobbler, too...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nilp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithalwen
[ . . . ]I would point out that this fascinating little Ranger twist (dont' remember anything quite like it in games I have played),means that while in ranger games the wolves will always have weigh the risk of not getting a kill against trying to get the players most dangerous to them out of the way - and if there are readable seer hints it will alert both Ranger and wolves potentially. This game there is the risk that one of them will die as well as not getting the desired kill. Dependent on how likely the surviving wolves feel any potential Seer is to have dreamt of them early they may think that risking another dream and getting a more certain kill is a better path than going for the most obvious first and possibly starting day 2 down to a lone wolf (even with seer/ranger out of the way). OK that was a verbose way of saying that the choice of Shasta may not be of major significance.
When I grow up, I wanna be as smart as my Mummie.
|
(Trans: That's something I haven't thought of. Heh.) |
Seconded. That would explain a few things– it's been suggested the wolves thought
Shasta was the Seer because of his case on
Lottie and/or comments about Sally, but I find that unlikely (unless they panicked). It's just so hard not to think of getting the Seer as the lupine priority.