Forgetting to say this in the last post I make this a separate post:
I find
Nerwen's explanation of her vote slightly peculiar.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
I might vote her, simply *because* I don't want a universal bandwaggon – and yeah, her vote was suspect, all right. The only thing I could say about it, really, is that this being *Kath*, she may honestly not realise what you're *supposed* to do on Day One. (Trouble is, looking at Kath tnds to bring Pitch back into it anyway.)
|
She suspects
Kath for her vote for
sally, but lets it go because of
Kath's usual Day Ones. After the "
Pitchwagon" she decides that she doesn't want to vote for someone who is obviously going to be lynched (what chance would there be of someone appearing 2 min. before deadline to save him?) and wants a good discussion about votes (and how they vary). So is that a reason to do a throwaway for someone whom you don't really suspect? Just for generating discussion? And not being associated with the "bandwaggon"?
The more I look at it the fishier it seems.
So once again, unless
Nerwen comes with convincing explanations (or corrections, if I have misread her reasoning), I'm 99% sure I'm voting her.
PS:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kath
Galadriel - voted for Pitch for meta-game reasons and then says he seemed so suspicious
|
When exactly did I say this after my vote? Either you are misreading my posts or I am misreading yours. It's true that toDay I "stated frustration", as you put it, but where, toDay, have I said that he was so suspicious (so it's his own fault he was lynched)?
I think many people misunderstand the explanation for my vote yesterDay. I had suspicions for both
Bom and
Pitch. There were two things that tipped the balance towards
Pitch: the ones that I listed. But they were like "last straws", not the foundation.