Okay, fine,
Inzil's an ordo. Fair enough. But you aren't allowed to suspect someone for thinking you were claiming something when you were acting like you were claiming something (and don't try to deny that,
Inzil, it's all over your D1 actions.)
Moving on -
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Shasta, for his comment yesterday on how it looked like I was "bussing Nog's lynch." But I call the bull when I see it and Nog was spouting a lot of it yesterday, even before Eonwe revealed he was a wolf. And with Nog, Shasta should know Nog will try to intimidate you, so you have to be over-zealous and throw his aggression right back at him. And today...really do I have to say it?
|
Your post was completely over the top, even for you. The wording just seemed too bloodthirsty for me not to mention it. And yes, you do - because as far as I can see, the only reason
anyone suspects me today is because I'm more concerned about the Acolyte than anyone else. So you definitely just look like you're bandwagoning one of the top suspects of the Day here.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Inzil
After Steve's reveal, Shasta votes for me, saying he thought I was the Acolyte since the previous Day. He's willing to vote for me over a probable Spy Day 2, yet Day 1 he had me in his "middle" category of suspicion and voted for Bom. He said I might be the target of a witch hunt then. I have a serious problem with this inconsistency. It looks like a possible attempt by a ShastaSpy to save a mate.
|
You
really think, if I was a wolf, I had a shot at saving the Seer-dreamt
Nogrod yesterday after he already had five votes against him? You vastly overestimate my skills, I'm afraid. Or you think I'm an idiot. Either or.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Inzil
It doesn't make sense to me still how an innocent could consider the Acolyte more worthy of killing than a wolf, even if it were certain who the Acolyte was.
|
Sigh. I will try to explain this one more time and then I'm dropping the subject entirely.
From my point of view, the
Acolyte had killed someone N1, along with the wolves. And do
not give me that rubbish about "oh it might have been a modkill,
Nerwen said she wouldn't tell us." If it were a modkill, she would have told us. I don't think I've ever seen a mod
not tell us if someone was modkilled, let alone the person themselves apologizing for having to drop over on the admin thread. It was an Acolyte-kill, end of discussion. Now then. If the Acolyte killed on N1, to my mind that meant they were at least some form of Werebear, and would more likely than not be killing
again. Given the high number of wolves in the village, it meant that the game would end that much faster if there were consistenly going to be more than one kill per night, unless the Bear happened to start hitting wolves. I didn't want to take that chance, so I wanted to remove the possibility of more than one kill per Night.
I genuinely don't know how to make it any clearer than that. If after reading this you still suspect me for it, then I'm
never going to get through to you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Inzil
And his third "point", that I hadn't denied it, is utter rubbish.
|
It wasn't the greatest, but it wasn't as bad as you make it out to be, either. My thinking was that since you hadn't denied it explicitly, but hadn't come out and claimed either, then perhaps you were getting around a "forbidden to claim" rule. We've seen them before, I don't think it's that much of a stretch.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Inzil
What does OMGUS mean again?
|
"Oh my gosh, you suck." Used when someone votes or suspects someone else based at least partly on the fact that they were suspected by that same person.
Most of the rest of this post is the exact same point, reiterated
ad infinitum, that I want (and still would like, actually) the Acolyte dead and that I couldn't be 100% positive it was
Inzil. I've gone over and gone over this point and I'm done with it.