Quote:
|
Originally Posted by G55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Now, why do you say that?
|
Because, looking at his posts, he seems a very convenient kill. On the other hand, possibly the wolves saw him as the Seer. The first argument sounds more probable. Inzil did not leave that clear a clue, so either the wolves indeed were really really sharp (possible) and omned on him because he was the Seer, or they thought he would be a good misleading village-confusing kill (probable), or a bit of both - he's a good kill, and maybe a Seer (also pretty probable). But to kill him solely because he's the Seer - man, the wolves have to be sharp - which doesn't make it impossible, only less probable. |
G55, short of a Day One reveal, I don't think *anyone* has *ever* been killed on Night Two
"solely because he was the Seer". Sorry, but this is just confusing the issue.
Now, in your previous post, you said this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by G55
I think that Zil has been killed either because he did not leave a clear enough trail, or because he left a nice false trail in my direction; I doubt that the wolves saw him as the Seer
|
*Here* you are pretty clear that you don't believe Seerish-ness was a significant factor at all, and *that's* what I was asking about.