I don't really know what to make of
Nog's attitude at the start of the day, what with missing
Glirdan's role and all. Given how doom and gloom he was, he
looks like an innocent who's just given up - but then there's the whole "what if he was just doing that on purpose to make me think that?" argument. I don't think I really want to draw any conclusions from that, specifically.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legate
Okay, so Glirdan, in fact, did not say anything almost at all, basically only one of his posts being somewhat relevant, and that mentioning G55 in totally ambiguous way and also Nog in slightly defensive way, but that's it. Basically a non-appearing Cobbler.
|
Pretty much this. I feel bad for
Kitanna. I do, however, remember him going a bit after
G55 yesterday rather early, which might make it more likely that someone he thought was a wolf was on that bandwagon early. That might be the first place I look once I've caught up with today.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legate
Summa summarum - the people she suspected are the ones I find rather suspicious too, so I wouldn't be too surprised about that the motive for her death might have been, apart from what I suggested above, simply that she was suspecting a Wolf, or even several Wolves. However that kind of reasoning has not been very common among Wolves lately, I think (or at least when I was last playing), and also, she certainly wasn't the only one who suspected those people. Again, if the reason was the opposite and the WWs wanted to frame somebody up, this is rather an extensive list, so not sure if that would work (if she suspected heavily just one person, fine, I could understand that). I have not been able to find anything that would point to her looking like a Ranger in her posts, which is a motive I would have expected from the WWs the most. Maybe the WWs just feared her being a sharp player and wanted to get rid of her, then. I would bet something between that, a Wolf on the list and/or the "no track in the voting list" idea I mentioned earlier. I wouldn't put that past Agan, for instance, to get rid of Lommy in such a manner (since she just briefly dropped suspecting her at that point, so there won't be immediate connection between them), of course we still have the full amount of Wolves, the whole pack needed a decisive motivation.
|
I've read and re-read this, and the only thing it seems to me you're actually saying here is that the
Lommy kill probably wasn't done to frame anyone, which is fairly obvious, isn't it? She wasn't being suspected really at all (I mentioned a few things yesterday, but if I recall correctly I'm the only one that did.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nog
How nicely you manage to get under the skin of a possible wolf-train of thought!
|
G55 did the same. Look how that turned out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Menel
After Day 1, much of the focus of conversations was on G55, who warned us that we should really look around at other people. A wolf in this case was probably trying to make sure that didn't happen. So we should be looking for someone who, during Day 2, kept trying to redirect suspicion onto G55.
|
I saw you mention later that
Nog fits this description, but I seem to recall
Sally doing a bit of the same. I'll go back and look here in a little while.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agan
I'd also like everyone to remember that if two innocents vote for a different innocent, the wolves are free to do as they please with the lynch.
|
It's actually
one, provided the wolves pile on their votes first. That's rather more scary, I think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kath
Voted sally but looks like she's getting sure about Nog and Agan being evil.
|
Re:
Lommy. If that's so, though, why follow
Agan's vote?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agan
What exactly is this for? We don't find the cobbler until he's dead. We can't do anything about the cobbler. It's the first sentence that caught my attention. It basically says, "We want to find the cobbler!" while the second sentence works to cover the question's real nature. I think it's extremely creepy.
|
A lot of what you're saying makes sense to me,
Agan, but this quote looks to me like
Sally's is asking for thoughts about
lynching the cobbler - which, indeed, is something we could have done about them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Oh, and I just want this noted, before I say anything else: my connection was playing up like crazy the last few hours, and stopped me from saying all I'd have liked. Or I would have commented more on the folly, in this game, of lynching someone to remove a source of distraction/controversy– cf. my treasure's "we pretty much have to know what she is". I cannot say it's necessarily a sign of guilt, though, since G55 herself made the same argument. Still, I can't say I like it.
|
True enough,
my pearl, but (at least in my case) the
G55 vote wasn't
exclusively to get rid of a source of distraction. There were legitimate reasons to suspect
G55 yesterday, and knowing her role shed light on several people (most notably
Nog and
Sally for their day 1 votes.)