Quote:
Originally Posted by Kath
Well then.
++ NERWEN
Reasoning reminder: Says we are likely to have four bad guys, then only lists three 'suspects'. Yes, yes I know it is all under this 'rule of three' silliness but hey, perhaps she knew full well there would only be three but hoped, as someone else mentioned, that seeming unsure of the number of wolves would suggest she was innocent.
|
Okay, that's actually a point to consider. Although personally I am not sure if I'd use it as sole reasoning (too random), but I'd like to actually hear if
Nerwen has anything to respond to that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echo
to be clear....lynch the witch ++KATH......or wolf in this matter of business.
|
Well, any more reasoning, or do you know more than we do? If you do, then at this rate you might just as well say so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kath
Legate ~ well I would like to see his reply to what I mentioned in the other post.
|
I didn't realise there was a question. But, to clarify then,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kath
I did check to make sure that in the intervening crossfire he had actually answered Cop's original question about what 'message' he had seen.
Nothing struck me weird on Lottie, if so, then rather about Cop. The flip-floppy chitter-chatter, especially if any of the other ones is also a Wolf (namely, Zil), because it doesn't sound like totally useless banter, but sounds like it might have a purpose (to seem like it's banter, while talking about Wolves, or even if there were two of them, then to seem like banter while talking about packmates).
Lommy. <-- The statement in question. Bolding mine because this is his answer to Cop asking 'what message?'.
Nope, I said nothing about wolf-to-wolf messages.
Which I would say is not entirely true, given the bit in bold.
|
It isn't wolf-
to-wolf, it's wolf-
about-wolf.
Cop talked about what I said first of all like I was talking about
messages from one wolf
to another. While I was talking about Wolves who want to speak (or have to speak)
about other, and are doing it in the way so that it does not look like they are excessively defending them, but also not that they are bringing too much attention to them.
Probably again x-posted with some... but going to vote soon.