LOTTIE
(Not including Serverman banter or other irrelevant stuff)
The first actual impressions on people, early on Day 1, are that she feels "pretty good" about
Cop, is shaky on me but leaning innocent, and thinks my Rule of Three squabble with
Legate looks innocent-on-innocent.
Lommy strikes her as "a little less innocent, but nothing that shoves her into 'terrifying sorcerer' territory just yet". Has no read on
Zil,
Kath or
Nerwen.
Then, speaking about
Kath accusing her of refusing to make a statement:
Quote:
Seriously, though, this post just made me rather uneasy about her. A lot of the reasoning seems forced, almost like she's trying to suspect people even though she knows they can't be sorcerers. It could just be Day-1 lack of proper suspicions and trying to get traction, but it doesn't sit well with me.
|
Finds
Cop's reaction to the whole "my tone looked off to me too" -discussion "wonderfully innocent" and is fairly certain
Cop is innocent. Is also "leaning innocentish" on
Legate, though with some reservations.
Then moving on to her famous vote post:
Quote:
So we have a triple tie between*Cop,*Kath, and*Legate, with no clarifying rules on tie-breakers? Well then.
++Kath*
I find her far more suspicious than either*Cop*or*Legate.
|
I get
Boro's (and was it
Shasta's?) point about this looking as if she was relieved about the choice being limited. However, in light of what she said prior to this, the vote makes perfect sense.
Kath was the only one she suspected anyway, whereas
Cop and
Legate were ones she had specifically mentioned looked innocentish to her.
Moving on to toDay, she suggests that a quote from Inzil might have been taken for a Seer hint or else that he was a no-trace kill. I don't really buy the Seer hint theory but it doesn't really tell me much about her innocence or guilt.
She thinks
Echo comes off as a nervous newbie (though "frustratingly and purposefully vague") and is willing to extend his newbie pass.
Holby alarms her, but she "gets the impression that's just her style". These reactions look to be following the same trend of being noncommittal and diplomatic that
Kath accused her of yesterDay.
She then argues slightly with
Kath and revises her opinion of Holby, saying she isn't sure anymore. She ends the post with
Quote:
YesterDay,*Kath*was my strongest suspicion, and I suppose she still is, but only by default. I'm mostly on the fence with her, leaning just a bit towards eeeeevil, but I'll probably spend more time looking over her posts later on to maybe see if I can work out where that feeling is coming from and whether or not it's justified.
|
Which is pretty much what I was thinking, too: where is this
Kath suspicion coming from? Apart from the one post on Day 1, she doesn't really give reasons for her consistent suspicion of
Kath. I hope she returns to elaborate!
And in her latest post to date, she comments on
McCaber coming out:
Quote:
I...don't think this is a move a sorcerer would make, especially not on Day 2 - it seems too risky. Can we be confident enough in that to write him off as a known innocent?
|
Which is more careful than most others, but seems sensible for both innocent and wolf.
Conclusions? On the whole, I think
Lottie looks pretty innocent. She is at times over-diplomatic and her
Kath-suspicion is a bit odd, but her general behaviour especially yesterDay seems logical and sensible. She's down to the Relatively Small Fish -category with
Steve, I'd say.
EDIT: x-ed since Lommy's 172