Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Well, that had to be done.
|
Really? For someone who talks about unnecessary posting, the last two posts were an awfully long way of saying 'a
Holby dream was more likely'. And then there's this point:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Actually... after looking at all this, I’d say it does speak for Kath’s innocence (particularly #62). Not because Echo was killed last Night, but because he/she wasn’t killed the Night before. Er– whatever Night that was– this being an important point. Apparently we began with a Day phase. In that case the Seer may have had no initial dream– if this is so, and the wolves knew it, it somewhat weakens the case for Kath.
|
What you're saying here is that the sorcerers would rather kill a new player whose playing style they know nothing about and which gained him/her a lot of suspicion and confusion instead of someone who everyone thought was innocent and was fairly no-trace after the first day? Considering the normal depth of your analysis, this looks like it could be a sneaky way to make it look like you didn't consider the situation fully to look more like an innocent. I'm starting to see where the
Nerwen-votes are coming from. And
Holby voting for you as she died does not help.
Not to mention that I thought we'd already agreed on the
Holby-dream being the most likely. I don't think anyone actually suggest a
Kath-dream to be more likely, except for me within the context of a 'make-it-look-like-we-though-
Echo-is-a-seer' kill.
edit: x-ed with
Cop