Alright, I'm back, and should be here until DL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kath
From yesterDay, I think Kitanna and sally's votes are suspicious. They are both clearly self preservation votes and this is acceptable as an innocent, and understandable as a wolf. What I find odd is that neither of them actually admitted to that. 
That Nog changed his suspicions through the Day made me feel happier about my early wonderings about him.
From my look at Greenie I think Lommy and Nerwen bear watching, but neither has leapt out as suspicious toDay to me.
Would really still like to know about double lynches as I feel that would have had a strong influence yesterDay on sally and Kitanna's voting.
And I rather feel that lynching sally or Kitanna would give more information here as a result.
There are already votes for Lottie and sally, so I will add the third name to the mix.
[*highlight]++Kitanna[/highlight*] |
So this caught my eye as being...off. I don't know
Kath's playing style very well, but this post of hers came off as being at once flippant - "they are both clearly self preservation votes", "I rather feel lynching sally or Kitanna would give more information" - and, at the same time, almost grasping at suspicions. For one thing, her suspicions about
Kit and
Sally are flimsy at best, but she phrases them as though they're simple and clean-cut and obvious. She mentions
Nog,
Nerwen, and
Lommy, but doesn't actually say anything about them - basically a "I thought they might be suspicious but I don't know" kind of statement that doesn't do anyone much good. I'm not at all happy with this vote, and
Kath has definitely jumped to the top of my list.