Quote:
Originally Posted by Faramir Jones
But then, I feel he was sidelined in the Jackson adaptation. The book centred around one hobbit, Bilbo Baggins, and his experiences; yet the films gave too much emphasis to the experiences of others, including those of a character out of fanfiction...
|
A couple of months ago I read this statement which Peter Jackson made in
an interview around the time the third film was released:
Quote:
"Obviously The Hobbit is the story of Thorin Oakenshields quest for the Lonely Mountain, and Lord of the Rings is the story of Frodos journey to try to destroy the ring. But they are nonetheless connected and they feed into each other and are in the same world."
|
Maybe he's just being
really literal about what the narrative of
The Hobbit is, but assuming he's not just repeating something he's mandated to say by WB, from a thematic or narrative-focus point of view he couldn't miss the point more if he tried. It's funny that he says that "The Lord of the Rings" (I assume he's talking about his films and not the books or anything else) is about Frodo and the Quest of the Ring (which the films are and aren't) but when he's describing "The Hobbit" Bilbo doesn't garner a mention, even though he's just named the film: "The
Hobbit".
"This is a story of how a Baggins had an adventure, and found himself doing and saying things altogether unexpected." No? It's about how a brooding Dwarf went to a Mountain? Oh, okay then.