Firefoot
She seems to start every Day with a theoretical analysis of something. D1 it is the deliberate tie, on D2 it is how different sides would have either wished or not wished for the tie, and on D3 she counts possible innocent vs. wolf ratios among the dead / living.
The third one is actually followed by an interesting thing:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ff#406
The significance of this is that if either of the wolf packs is missing members, I would think they would be getting a bit nervous/desperate (depending on how many missing members...), not knowing whether the other pack is in similar shape. Could be telling toDay (for comparison, at the start of Day 2, there was a 51% all the people killed were innocent). (Hmm…)
|
How come she thinks about these things as the very first thing of the Day - maybe it's something very close?
On D2 she clearly goes nudging both
Rikae and
Mac in a way I'm used to see more from the wolves - but it is not anything conclusive of course as the innocents can test the waters as well.
With
Rikae she jumps quite fast to
Nerwen’s question whether
Rikae actually knew
Rune was killed because he was looking gifted (#253) by saying
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ff
I was also getting some bad vibes from Rikae, but don't have any reasons or analysis to back it up yet.
|
With
Mac (#284) she makes the classic:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ff
Anyone else think Mac responded really defensively to what I thought was at best a rather half-hearted accusation? (referencing posts 252 and 281)?
|
Being clearly more active on D3 she has been all over the place doing many things - like taking care we set up this information line
Nilp had reminded should be there. And being invaluable in there.
But then in #419 She first makes a pretty detailed speculation as to how the wolves could kill if the lover sacrificed - and then turned to speculate with the possibility of rather lynching the ranger!
#427 is the post which
Lottie-wolf spotted in her frenzy and where she puts the Night-kills nicely in place.
And then of course her #534 where she defends herself by saying that
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ff
I'd also like to point out that I have been pretty consistent in my suspicion of Mac, and voted for him yesterday
|
And since when has consistency been anything but the privilege of those who already know something?
It seems her suspicions have been pretty consistent though - and yes we can also speculate if she then is the seer (happily we can do it here). But I'll check them and leave you with this thus far so that you can get some first ideas about how interesting
Firefoot is (I mean she could be anything).
What do you think?