Just thinking then.
She gives us two wolves (more or less confirmed by their actions) on one Day (one already dead, one living as she declared them).
The next Day she gives us one innocent (who thence died by Night), more or less gives other three by ignorance (leaving them out of the list of where to find the wolves & jokingly defending them when asked) and as an extra one long dead innocent.
That makes 7 - among them both dead and living (at the time she mentioned them) or just four (2 dead, 2 living) but with fex.
tp dying already on N2 it doesn't seem to make sense.
I'm not sure what to make of this.
If she is the Seer this is superb playing, walking the tightrope between giving as much info as possible (from 8 dreams) while remaining an enigma to the wolves... well to everyone.
Other option of course is that she is of a more sinister kind and either has some info or just got lucky with at least
Lottie.
What kind of bothers me is that if we should read her posting as her revealing 7 roles it's interesting only two of them were dead when she claimed them (
Mac the Night just before and
tp on the first game-Night). With half the population here in the Dead Thread you'd think the dreams would have fallen a bit more evenly (even if the seer of course can decide every Night not to pick any already dead) - or maybe the maths work in some other way my intuition would tell me.
Also it is interesting that she first wails very strongly the lack of information and suddenly starts to produce it, a lot.
I hope she is the seer but I'm not totally convinced she is one (that's good actually if she is one, it means she is playing it well).
Btw. could it be possible there was such a role-messing that the seer would be a different person every Night but there would be one mouthpiece who'd receive all the dreams? Well, of course it is possible, but could it explain something, like the lack of a more "normal" seer-revelation?
