Last night I saw "The Hobbit" as a play. The title page said that it was Authorized by J.R.R. Tolkien.
It did include:
- the Dwarves at Bag End
- The Trolls
- Fight with Goblins in the Mountains
- Riddles in the Dark
- Mirkwood travels
- Elf party & following imprisonment
- Key in the hole at the Lonely Mountain
- Bilbo and Smaug's dialogue
- Elves and Dwarves contending for the treasure
- Gandalf sometimes present sometimes absent
- the death of Smaug
- Bilbo goes home with treasure & newfound wisdom ... and the Ring
It did
not include:
- Rivendel
- Elrond
- Beorn
- Laketown
- Bard and his arrow
- The Battle of Five Armies
- The Arkenstone
- The death of Thorin
What struck me as odd was:
- the Dwarves knew about the ring in Mirkwood already
- The Elves and Dwarves contended at the door to the Lonely Mountain and forged an agreement there to split the treasure justly
- Thorin kills Smaug with an Elven sword given to him by the Queen of the Elves
Well, it left me cold. It is known that Tolkien's opinion of stage productions of literary works was not high. Yet he authorized this version.
I suppose you have to see it to really appreciate the differences. And, I suppose, that if there's going to be a play, on a stage, with really limited props and stage effects, you can't have a battle and you can't have a dragon flying. And you don't have time to do justice to all of the nuances in the book. Was this the best that could be done for a play? Probably. Worth seeing? Not sure. The characterization was actually quite good, Bombur practically stole the show.
There is, however, one thing that grates on my nerves. The actor who played Gollum too, the Andy Serkas template and swallowed all his words so you couldn't understand much at all. Very disappointing.