A look at
Lhuna:
On Day 1, she self-votes which doesn't point innocence or guilt. Either way, I'm not a fan of it because it avoids tracing. This is where she also points out
Hui's slip, in which I'd like to echo
Lommy and
Greenie's comments from toDay:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greenie
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Yeah, I noticed this when Lhuna pointed it out but it was so glaring that I actually ignored it?! Given that, like I've said, I had hard time understanding where Hui was ever coming from, I gave them the benefit of doubt and interpreted it as them talking about having email subsrcibed to the ww thread. But looks like the simpler explanation was true and I should have certainly remembered this slip because had Hui's meaning been innocent, I can't see why they wouldn't have replied to Lhuna and clarified it. But yes, quite telling that no one else than Lhuna caught onto or commented on this. (I'm not sure it automatically makes Lhuna innocent though? If the slipup seemed obvious to wolf!Lhuna, wouldn't she hurry to point it out because she might feel it's fishy not to. Then maybe she dropped it because everybody else ignored it and she thought maybe she overreacted and her packmate didn't condemn themselves after all?)
|
Hm. I find Lhuna somewhat concerning so this is a definite possibility - in a way, a fellow wolf would be more sensitive to noticing wolf slips or thinking them obviously noticeable to everyone given that she'd know it was a slip. |
...because I completely agree.
In the same post she writes:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
Brinn - just enough input to be visible, but feels careful. Noncommittal. Slippery.
Zil - if he's a wolf, he'll just hide under a cover of making sense.
Kitanna - jumpy, but maybe just an anxious ordo
Mac - scary. Yep, despite having only one post (I think) so far.
Boro - I don't know, I just don't trust him. And with 59 games under his belt, he seems like he's capable of unfathomable depths of deceit.
|
It was still early in the Day, but still she seems to draw up some suspicion without committing to it.
Day 2: She replies to
Inzil's comment on
Kit with
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
Ditto. I'm kind of wondering how she's still alive. My reasoning goes round in circles but hovers more over somewhere unsettling.
|
I believe some others have mentioned that her involvement in this discussion is worrisome and I concur. Her second sentence seems like she's setting
Kit up for suspicion, which could be the reason why the wolves risked not killing her the previous Night. After
Kit says she knew
G55 was lying, she continues to push:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
How? As an ordo your certainty can only be asymptotic to 100% AT BEST. But I didn't think you would be so careless? flippant? bold? as to post that if you 100% k3new for sure, if you get my meaning. Hence my reasoning in circles.
Edit: Or as a wolf, for that matter
|
Response to
Hui:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hui
Looking at the crossposts: do we really want to be pressing Kitanna for more information? Fine if she's a wolf, but otherwise isn't it better to keep the wolves guessing?
|
Not so much pressing her for information as loudly wondering how she's alive and if she has anything to say about it. |
Her next comment on the matter:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
My thinking was more along the lines of she might either know who the Ranger is, or be unable to commit suicide at Night. But I agree with moving on for now.
|
But if
Kit knew who the ranger was that could indicate that she's the seer...so why bring it up?
In post #394, she decides to focus on analyzing the
G55 voters since it was still technically a vote for an innocent. In summary:
Kath: Finds her vote fishy since she didn't say much about
G55 until the last couple posts.
Inzil: Calls his vote suspiciously bandwagonny.
Lottie: Leaning innocent for sincerity.
Lommy: Says of her:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
Said "Quite a bold statement for Day1 and pretty much out of nowhere??" to Lottie over something the latter had said a couple of times throughout the Day. Then her posts at the end of yesterDay. Prefaced her vote with "let's make this interesting."
|
Then proceeds to point out
Lommy's posts after the fake ranger reveal. Calls her "Wicked. Tricksy. False."
Hui: Says
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
If he voted Pitch as he preferred, he would have nearly contributed to a three-way tie, although I'm not sure if anyone else (other than Lottie, who at that point had already voted) would also vote for Pitch. Huin-Brinn wolf pair? Can it be that blatant?
|
Seems inconclusive about him.
Brinn: Finds my vote reasonable being self-preservation, but my behavior suspicious.
In post #425, she again questions my Day1 behavior and finds
Eonwe somewhat suspicious for his Day 1 vote and current posting. Says she might vote
Brinn, Lommy, or to a lesser extent,
Mac (for his strange behavior, but she's not convinced it's wolfish). She ends up voting
Lommy and adds this comment:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lhuna
Parting shot: Friendly reminder, a bandwagon does not start with the first vote.
|
ToDay she noted my response and says she stands corrected, but it doesn't remove the uneasiness I have from it. Her vote for
Lommy feels weak - I don't think there's strong reasoning behind it.
Okay, I had some concerns about
Lhuna's posts from yesterDay, and after really reviewing them, I do find her suspicious. For her involvement in the ranger discussion, the way she encouraged suspicion against me in a subtle way, her vote yesterDay, and her bringing up
Hui's slip.
--
Okay, I was considering looking at
Kath toDay, but I'm running short on time for another long analysis. And I'm actually feeling okay about her for now because I agree with several of her points in post #685.