Quote:
Originally Posted by Galin
Whaddayamean if?
|
My apologies. I read your post and you seemed rather dubious about your information. You stated:
Plus, I think the only text with Ereinion in it [unless I've missed another reference] dates rather late, ...
Looking up your references indicates to me that you are entirely correct, inasmuch as Christopher Tolkien originally knew the name Ereinion only from the article “The Shibboleth of Fëanor” in
The Peoples of Middle-earth (HoME XII). Other references are taken from there and later are considered by him to be erroneous.
I agree from checking the word
scion in several dictionaries that
scion means generally “heir of noble birth”, not necessarily a descendant of a king or king, and so equally would be a meaningful name whether Gil-Galad be taken as a son of Fingon or a son of Orodreth.
I note that Tolkien does not even mention Orodreth (or Orodreth’s daughter Finduilas) in Galadriel’s statement brought forth by mhagain. Presumably Orodreth has been forgotten by Tolkien accidentally or Orodreth is now considered to be a son of Finrod and so not mentioned by Galadriel in her utterance concerning her siblings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaf
I think the biggest difference between CT´s Silmarillion and a hypothetical version of the Silmarillion made by J.R.R. Tolkien himself would be the frame of the story or the structure of the narrative in general.
|
I agree. Christopher Tolkien could have included some of the material stating that the
Silmarillion was only Númenorian legend but may have felt that that would have been too complicated a concept. Best just let the
Silmarillion stand as story without any frame.