Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
Folks, please stop assuming people are trying to dictate to the dead!
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
the idea is that the dead have a choice. That way the dead can both cast a vote and send an additional message.
And as for me, if/when I end up on the dead thread, I'd prefer to have as much ability to get information to the living as possible. In fact, I would be rather frustrated with (and suspicious of) anyone who muddles that process.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
It doesn't matter who decides how the message will be sent. It doesn't require elaborate choosing of spokespeople, just an agreement well before the deadline.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
It's interesting how many people are arguing that it either can't be done or is somehow oppressive. And by interesting, I mean suspicious.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
the spokesperson is whoever gives a reasonable list when the voting is done. It doesn't matter whether person X or person Y gets the extra vote, when both voted for person Z. It also doesn't matter which meaning we assign to empowering person X or person Y, as long as we're clear on it before DL.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
As long as the dead have enough options, whatever the first person says should be fine.
|
Yes. Yes to everything.
Nog and others- if you are good and
Rikae is evil, I do wonder what your excuse is for being so clearly dominated when it comes to exercising common sense.
Rikae is just hitting it out of the park.
People seem to be trying to make things more difficult than they have to be. It's like we're trying to hand you a weapon and you don't want to take it.