Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Raynor
Again, it seems to me that the main difference between us is that for you a Christian work is one in which there are refferences to only what is absolutely unique in Christianity - if the work would evolve solely around that, it would be rather barren. [Btw, IIRC, in hinduism, it is Brahma who is the creative aspect of God, not Vishnu]
|
If the work contains equally strong elements of other faiths/beliefs (as it does, if anyone wishes to get into some alternative reader-resonse research) then can we still call it a Christian work? Shouldn't we really be calling it an Ecumenical or Universal work?
The fact still remains that the books do not contain that one major (in fact, pretty damn fundamental) aspect of Christianity. Christ.
Hmm, I wonder has anyone considered that perhaps Tolkien, as a devout Catholic, recognised that
the Bible, as the Word of God, was the
only definitive Christian text. Why would he have sought to demean the
real Bible by attempting to create his
own version? Wouldn't that be blasphemous?